Kenya’s tourism industry is grappling with the impact of a sharp increase in national park entry fees introduced in October 2025. The revised structure, announced by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), has seen charges for both domestic and international visitors rise by between 30% and 100%, depending on the park and visitor category.
Under the new rates, East African adult citizens now pay KSh 1,000 to access Nairobi National Park, up from KSh 500, while non-resident adults are charged USD 80, double the previous rate of USD 40. Similarly, entry fees for iconic destinations such as Maasai Mara National Reserve have increased from USD 70 to USD 120 per adult non resident during peak season. In Amboseli and Tsavo National Parks, prices for non residents have climbed from USD 60 to USD 100, while regional citizens now pay between KSh 800 and KSh 1,500, depending on the park.
According to KWS, the adjustments aim to close a KSh 12 billion conservation funding gap, ensuring that wildlife protection, infrastructure, and ranger operations are adequately supported. The agency argues that maintaining ecological sustainability requires consistent revenue streams and that Kenya’s parks have long been underpriced compared to other global wildlife destinations.
However, tour operators and hospitality associations have voiced concerns that the hikes could make Kenya less competitive compared to neighboring countries. In Tanzania, for example, entry to Serengeti National Park remains at USD 70, while Uganda’s Bwindi Impenetrable Forest costs USD 50. Industry players warn that the new pricing could reduce visitor volumes, especially among budget travelers and repeat domestic tourists.
Adding to the concern are newly introduced digital payment surcharges, averaging 5% to 8%, applied to online transactions. Many operators argue that these hidden costs increase the overall expense for tourists and reduce profit margins for local businesses.
Despite the challenges, some conservationists see the move as necessary for long-term sustainability. Higher fees, if properly managed, could improve park facilities, enhance wildlife protection, and support community development around conservation zones.
The government’s next task will be to monitor the effects of the new system. If the increases lead to reduced park attendance, Kenya may need to recalibrate its approach—ensuring that conservation funding goals are met without pricing out both local and international visitors.
Ultimately, the fee hike underscores a broader dilemma: how to sustain Kenya’s world-renowned wildlife heritage while keeping its tourism sector vibrant, inclusive, and globally competitive.
Kenya’s rare-earth minerals: How the country is becoming a global strategic hotspot
