Sharp Daily
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Real Estate
  • Opinion
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Real Estate
  • Opinion
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Nelson Havi seeks court intervention to halt High Court judge selection process

Brenda Murungi by Brenda Murungi
March 27, 2024
in News
Reading Time: 1 min read

Nelson Havi has requested the court to halt the interview process for the shortlisted judges. Havi contends that Macharia Njeru, the male representative of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), should not be involved in assessing applications, shortlisting candidates, or conducting interviews for judges.

He asserts that Samson Omwanza Ombati was elected to replace Njeru and is expected to assume office on May 14th.

“The petitioner has suffered and will continue to suffer misrepresentation at the JSC by the second respondent whose elective representative mandate ended with the election of Samson Omwanza Ombati,” reads the petition.

Judicial Service Commission and Macharia Njeru have been listed as respondents in the case. In March of this year, the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) selected 100 candidates for interviews to fill 20 vacancies for High Court judges.

RELATEDPOSTS

Chebukati left out on JSC shortlist for Court of Appeal judges

April 23, 2024

JSC appoints Frida Boyani as new Chief Registrar

March 19, 2024

The interviews are scheduled to take place from April 3rd to April 30th, 2024. Havi insists that the JSC should provide an explanation for why the first 20 shortlisted candidates all possess at least 14 years of experience, with none falling below this threshold.

“On the other hand, for the first 20 rejected applications 7 are between 10 years and 14 years practice years limit,” reads court appears.

Havi insists that Njeru’s authority is restricted during the transition period, alleging a conflict of interest. He further alleges that there is discrimination involved in the matter.

“It will be prejudicial and against the public interest to proceed with the interviews set to commence on 3rd April 2024 before a decision is made on serious constitutional issues raised in the petition,” reads court papers.

Previous Post

Impacts of Japan’s exit from negative interest rates

Next Post

Govt entities fail to remit KES 73 billion Pension, PAYE dues

Brenda Murungi

Brenda Murungi

Related Posts

News

Expanding opportunities for Kenyan investors

October 12, 2026
News

Why Matatu Fares Rise With the Rain and Never Come Back Down

October 9, 2026
News

Kenya Without an IMF Programme: What Does It Mean for the Economy and Investors?

October 9, 2026
Analysis

Kenya’s kSh340 billion infrastructure fund goes live

October 9, 2026
News

Public Debt and Economic Growth

October 9, 2026
News

Shariah compliant investment products expand as Islamic finance nears $6 Trillion

October 9, 2026

LATEST STORIES

Kenya plans a central database to track recycled phone numbers

October 12, 2026

The Hidden Retirement Crisis Facing Kenyans

October 12, 2026

Expanding opportunities for Kenyan investors

October 12, 2026

Why access to affordable credit is critical for business growth

October 9, 2026

Why Matatu Fares Rise With the Rain and Never Come Back Down

October 9, 2026

Kenya Without an IMF Programme: What Does It Mean for the Economy and Investors?

October 9, 2026

Kenya’s kSh340 billion infrastructure fund goes live

October 9, 2026

Public Debt and Economic Growth

October 9, 2026
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Email us: editor@thesharpdaily.com

Sharp Daily © 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Real Estate
  • Opinion
  • About Us

Sharp Daily © 2024