Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Wednesday, July 9, 2025
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
Sharp Daily
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

Kenya’s remittance risk

Hezron Mwangi by Hezron Mwangi
May 28, 2025
in Economy
Reading Time: 3 mins read

On March 6, 2025, I wrote an article titled “The looming threat of taxes on remittances: Kenya must prepare,” warning that  taxes could undermine the KES 640.8 billion in remittances Kenya received in 2024, a vital lifeline for households and economic stability. With the era of protectionism resurging, the U.S. “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a reconciliation bill, has introduced a 5.0% excise tax on remittances by non-U.S. citizens, a development that was bound to happen given global trends toward economic nationalism. This policy, far from a surprise, demands practical measures to safeguard Kenya’s economy.

Section 112105 of the bill imposes a 5.0% tax on transfers by non-U.S. citizens, including H-1B visa holders and green card holders. A USD 1,000 remittance to Kenya now loses USD 50, potentially reducing annual inflows by KES 17.0 billion. The bill, passed by the House Ways and Means Committee on May 12, 2025, awaits Senate approval. As the U.S. is Kenya’s top remittance source, this tax could shrink household budgets for education, healthcare, and small businesses, weaken the shilling, and inflate import costs.

Unlike the tax risks I highlighted in March, this U.S. policy, a predictable outcome of protectionist sentiment, directly raises cross-border transfer costs. Some senders may turn to informal channels, risking loss of financial transparency and increased fraud. This underscores the urgency for Kenya to implement practical measures to mitigate the impact and reduce its economic reliance on remittances.

First, Kenya should enhance digital payment platforms like M-Pesa, which offers low-cost transfers. By expanding its reach and reducing fees further, M-Pesa can absorb some of the tax’s burden. Second, investing in financial literacy programs is critical. Educating the diaspora on cost-effective transfer methods, such as mobile apps and remittance aggregator platforms, can help reduce costs and improve efficiency.

RELATEDPOSTS

World Bank: Kenya’s growth at risk from debt and poverty

May 26, 2025

Kenya’s economy gains momentum in April, Stanbic PMI shows

May 20, 2025

Instead of relying on unregulated solutions, Kenya should focus on strengthening partnerships between domestic banks and international money transfer operators (MTOs). By negotiating bilateral agreements that lower transaction fees or eliminate double taxation, Kenya can protect remittance flows. Additionally, encouraging the licensing of more competitive MTOs will foster market competition, leading to better pricing and service quality for remittance senders and recipients alike.

Beyond remittances, Kenya must diversify its economy to cushion the impact. Promoting export-led growth in agriculture and manufacturing, as I urged in March, can boost foreign exchange earnings. For instance, scaling up value-added agricultural exports like coffee and tea could offset remittance declines. Additionally, incentivizing domestic investment through tax breaks for small businesses can stimulate job creation, reducing dependence on diaspora funds. Strengthening vocational training programs to equip youth for local industries will further build resilience.

The protectionist wave, exemplified by this bill, is a wake-up call. While the Senate vote looms, Kenya cannot rely on external leniency. By leveraging digital platforms, fostering competitive remittance ecosystems, and diversifying revenue streams, Kenya can protect its economy. As I warned in March, proactive measures are essential to ensure remittances remain a pillar of stability in this new era.

Previous Post

Security concerns in Kerio Valley lead to school closures

Next Post

Foreign influence in Kenya’s credit crisis

Hezron Mwangi

Hezron Mwangi

Related Posts

Economy

How Kenya is future-proofing its economy against illicit finance

July 9, 2025
Economy

The mechanics of currency manipulation

June 27, 2025
Economy

What happened to president Ruto’s economic dream?

June 27, 2025
Economy

Kenya must tame stock market volatility to unlock corporate growth

June 26, 2025
Economy

How dairy bonuses are becoming a lifeline for Kenyan farmers

June 25, 2025
Economy

It’s Parliament vs Treasury on the battle over zero-rated essentials.

June 19, 2025

LATEST STORIES

How Kenya is future-proofing its economy against illicit finance

July 9, 2025

The importance of Investment Policy Statements (IPS) for pension schemes in Kenya

July 4, 2025

Understanding Life Cover as an Additional Benefit in Retirement Benefit Schemes

July 4, 2025

Del Monte foods files for bankruptcy in USA

July 3, 2025

Lessons from the Kuramo-TransCentury fallout

July 3, 2025

Private vs Public Pension Funds in Kenya

June 30, 2025

The mechanics of currency manipulation

June 27, 2025

Understanding how to access your pension savings in Kenya.

June 27, 2025
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Email us: editor@thesharpdaily.com

Sharp Daily © 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team

Sharp Daily © 2024