Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, June 29, 2025
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
Sharp Daily
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Court halts KES 74M withdrawal from Rwandese investor’s account

Faith Chandianya by Faith Chandianya
January 3, 2024
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read

Desire Muhinyuza has received relief as the high court intervened to prevent two attorneys from withdrawing KES 73 million from the USD 2.6 million (400 million) held by the government.

Justice Alfred Mabeya has prohibited lawyers Omwanza Nyamweya and Ivy Ateko Igati from claiming KES 74 million in legal fees from StayOnline (SOL), a company embroiled in an ownership dispute between Muhinyuza and Kenyan businessman Kirimi Koome.

The legal representatives of Muhinyuza, namely Danstan Omari, Shadrack Wambui, Omayio Aranga, and Sophie Nekesa, who were opposing the legal fee claim, argued that the two lawyers were acting on behalf of Koome, not SOL. Justice Mabeya ruled that Koome had defrauded Muhinyuza.

Omari urged the judge to prevent Omwanza and Ingati from pursuing any legal claim on behalf of SOL. In a virtual ruling, Justice Mabeya concurred with Omari, stating that Omwanza and Ingati cannot seek legal remuneration from Muhinyuza and SOL, as they never represented the latter.

RELATEDPOSTS

Ngunyi supports Ruto, urges him to defy law for national progress

January 4, 2024

Rwandan investor Muhinyuza triumphs in company ownership legal battle

December 28, 2023

Justice Mabeya issued a temporary order staying the implications of the consent order of October 30, directing the manager of United Bank of Africa (UBA) to transfer the sum of KES 74 million plus accrued interest. The court ordered that the case filed by Stay Online, which seeks to block the money transfer, be heard on February 16.

These orders, blocking the fund transfer, have sparked a fresh dispute among the lawyers involved in the KES 400 million ownership dispute between Rwandan investor Desire Muhinyuza and a demand for KES74 million in legal fees.

 

 

Previous Post

Kenya power to end postpaid metres in rural areas

Next Post

Judges and magistrates condemn Ruto for abusing his power and trampling on judiciary

Faith Chandianya

Faith Chandianya

Related Posts

News

Private vs Public Pension Funds in Kenya

June 27, 2025
Investments

Investor shift to long term bonds drives oversubscription in CBK’s reopened auction

June 19, 2025
News

The real price of Israel – Iran Conflict for Kenya.

June 19, 2025
Economy

Resilient but strained: Kenyan firms speak out in May 2025 CEO survey.

June 19, 2025
News

Co-op Bank posts KES 6.9 billion profit in Q1’2025

May 16, 2025
Agriculture And Economy
News

Lets get Kenya out of FATF list

May 9, 2025

LATEST STORIES

Private vs Public Pension Funds in Kenya

June 27, 2025

The mechanics of currency manipulation

June 27, 2025

Understanding how to access your pension savings in Kenya.

June 27, 2025

What happened to president Ruto’s economic dream?

June 27, 2025

Opinion: Populism feeds votes, not growth

June 27, 2025

Competitive advantages of small businesses

June 26, 2025

Opinion: Invest in sports for national prosperity

June 26, 2025

Ethiopia’s access to Eritrean ports is a game-changer for trade

June 26, 2025
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Email us: editor@thesharpdaily.com

Sharp Daily © 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team

Sharp Daily © 2024