Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Monday, September 21, 2026
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
Sharp Daily
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Rethinking the Global Payments System: Is the World Moving Beyond SWIFT and the Dollar?

Ryan Macharia by Ryan Macharia
January 30, 2026
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read

 

Most international bank transfers today still rely on the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) network, a secure messaging platform used by more than 11,000 financial institutions in over 200 countries. It enables correspondence between banks and other financial entities around the world and supports the bulk of cross-border payments in global trade and finance.

 

Despite SWIFT’s dominance, there has been a growing clamor for alternatives or complementary systems, driven by perceptions of risk, cost, and geopolitical pressures. This debate intensified after some Russian banks were threatened with exclusion from SWIFT in 2022 following the invasion of Ukraine. The potential consequence of such a disconnection highlighted the vulnerability of depending on a single global payment network.

RELATEDPOSTS

Liquidity Risk: Why the Ability to Exit an Investment Matters

September 21, 2026

Turning Pension Contributions into Retirement Income

September 21, 2026

 

One of the clearest responses has been China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS). Launched in 2015 and backed by the People’s Bank of China, CIPS offers both messaging and clearing services for transactions in the Chinese renminbi (RMB). It now connects more than 1,500 institutions across more than 100 countries and handles significant volumes of RMB transactions, especially as Beijing promotes wider international use of its currency.

 

Russia has also developed its own messaging infrastructure, the System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS), initially created in 2014 following threats of SWIFT exclusion and expanded after 2022 sanctions. SPFS primarily supports domestic settlement among Russian banks, though efforts have been made to expand its reach.

 

Regional alternatives are also emerging. The BRICS Pay initiative seeks to enable cross-border payments in member countries’ currencies, reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar and traditional correspondent banking channels. In Africa and Asia, local and regional arrangements, such as integration of India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) with other markets, signal interest in more efficient cross-border systems, especially for retail and remittance flows.

 

Despite these developments, SWIFT remains the backbone of global payments due to its unparalleled reach and integration with existing financial infrastructure. However, the landscape is shifting: SWIFT itself is evolving, including exploring blockchain-based extensions aimed at improving speed and lower costs.

 

The potential move away from a dollar-centric system is part of this broader shift. While the U.S. dollar still dominates global payments, countries are exploring settlement in local currencies and digital assets as part of broader financial diversification strategies.

 

What this means for the future is not a sudden collapse of the current system, but a gradual layering of alternatives alongside SWIFT, each serving different corridors, currencies, and use cases. Whether driven by efficiency, cost reduction, geopolitical risk management, or digital innovation, the rising interest in alternative payment frameworks points to an evolving global financial architecture that places a higher premium on resiliency, choice, and interconnectedness.

 

Start your investment journey today with the Cytonn Money Market Fund. Call + 254 (0)709101200 or email sales@cytonn.com

Previous Post

Diaspora Remittances in Kenya: Consumption Support or a Catalyst for Growth?

Next Post

Kenya’s Shift to Yuan-Denominated Debt: Economic Strategy, Risks, and Regional Momentum

Ryan Macharia

Ryan Macharia

Related Posts

News

Liquidity Risk: Why the Ability to Exit an Investment Matters

September 21, 2026
News

How Kenyan Households Can Build More Resilient Portfolios

September 18, 2026
News

Safaricom Divestiture Reversed: High Court Nullifies Kshs 204.3 bn Vodacom Stake Sale

September 17, 2026
Analysis

Family bank joins NSE: What it means for investors

September 17, 2026
News

Student Housing as an Investment Frontier

September 17, 2026
News

Kenya’s collective investment market moves toward a new phase

September 16, 2026

LATEST STORIES

Liquidity Risk: Why the Ability to Exit an Investment Matters

September 21, 2026

Turning Pension Contributions into Retirement Income

September 21, 2026

Why Kenyan businesses must take climate risk more seriously

September 18, 2026

How Kenyan Households Can Build More Resilient Portfolios

September 18, 2026

Cost-cutting strategies to make your pension last

September 18, 2026

Safaricom Divestiture Reversed: High Court Nullifies Kshs 204.3 bn Vodacom Stake Sale

September 17, 2026

Family bank joins NSE: What it means for investors

September 17, 2026

Apple TV now officially available in Kenya via iCloud+

September 17, 2026
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Email us: editor@thesharpdaily.com

Sharp Daily © 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team

Sharp Daily © 2024