Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Saturday, October 18, 2025
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
Sharp Daily
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home Investments

How money market investments are being exploited by money launderers

Joseph Muriithi by Joseph Muriithi
January 10, 2025
in Investments
Reading Time: 2 mins read

Money laundering has become increasingly prevalent in the country, particularly in the financial technology sector, introducing terms like ‘carding’ and others into the conversation. As investment options expand, one notable avenue gaining popularity is the ‘Money Market’. However, as this investment vehicle rises in prominence, it also presents a potential avenue for money launderers to clean illicit funds. Fund managers must remain vigilant and watch for key indicators of suspicious activities. This article explores some of the warning signs that may suggest money laundering activities among clients.

A red flag for money laundering arises when a customer refuses to disclose full information during the account-opening process. Legitimate investors are typically forthcoming with personal and financial details required for compliance checks. Reluctance or avoidance in providing such information may indicate an intent to obscure identity or the true purpose of the account.

When a single address is linked to multiple accounts, it suggests coordinated activity that could indicate layering, a common money laundering technique. This could involve creating several accounts to move funds in small amounts, reducing the chances of detection by regulatory authorities

Clients who deposit funds into an account and swiftly withdraw them after a short duration often raise suspicion. Such behavior may be indicative of layering or smurfing, where funds are moved rapidly to disrupt traceability.

RELATEDPOSTS

The Challenge of Preserving Retirement Savings in Kenya

October 16, 2025

Kenya Pipeline IPO deadline extended to 2026 and what it means for the Privatization Agenda

October 9, 2025

Frequent deposits of large amounts of small-denomination currency into an account may indicate structuring. This technique is used to bypass reporting requirements by breaking up large sums of money into smaller, less conspicuous transactions

A client’s hesitancy or outright refusal to meet with the fund manager or their team in person can signal an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Personal interactions are often essential for verification and due diligence, making reluctance a notable concern.

During account opening, a client’s inability or refusal to provide a legitimate source for their funds is a major red flag. Transparency regarding the origin of funds is crucial for preventing illicit activities and ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.

If a client fails to disclose information about the beneficial owner of an account, it could signify an attempt to obscure the identity of the true owner. This is a common tactic to hide illicit funds under the guise of a legitimate account holder.

A client who regularly conducts transactions with money service businesses, such as currency exchanges or remittance services, may warrant closer scrutiny. These businesses are often exploited in layering schemes due to the high volume and anonymity of transactions they handle.

Each of these scenarios highlights a potential avenue for money laundering and emphasizes the need for fund managers and financial institutions to remain vigilant, conduct thorough due diligence, and report suspicious activities to regulatory authorities.

Previous Post

New bill on virtual assets ecosystem opens for public participation

Next Post

The impact of lower Central Bank Rates on equity market growth

Joseph Muriithi

Joseph Muriithi

Related Posts

Investments

The Challenge of Preserving Retirement Savings in Kenya

October 16, 2025
Investments

EABL to redeem KES 11.0 billion medium-term notes ahead of schedule

October 14, 2025
Investments

Kenya’s 2028 Eurobond Buyback marks a turning point in debt management

October 14, 2025
Investments

Kenya shifts to bond financing for SGR and JKIA expansion

October 13, 2025
Investments

Kenya Pipeline IPO deadline extended to 2026 and what it means for the Privatization Agenda

October 9, 2025
Analysis

Valuation multiples

October 9, 2025

LATEST STORIES

The Challenge of Preserving Retirement Savings in Kenya

October 16, 2025

Understanding Segregated vs Guaranteed Pension Schemes

October 16, 2025

The Sanlam-Jubilee deal

October 16, 2025

Kenya’s industrial real estate awakening

October 16, 2025

Stanbic Kenya in advanced talks to acquire NCBA: A game-changer in Kenya’s banking sector

October 16, 2025

CBK flags surge in financial fraud as losses triple to KES 1.6 billion

October 15, 2025

StanChart Kenya retirees face fresh legal stalemate over KES 7.0 billion pension payout

October 15, 2025

U.S. bank earnings take center stage amid government data freeze

October 15, 2025
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Email us: editor@thesharpdaily.com

Sharp Daily © 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team

Sharp Daily © 2024