Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, June 1, 2025
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
Sharp Daily
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
No Result
View All Result
Sharp Daily
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Jurispesa? Questions arise as land dispute yields two opposing court verdicts in Kenya

Brian Murimi by Brian Murimi
September 14, 2024
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read

A Kenyan magistrate court has issued two contradictory judgments in a land dispute case, raising concerns about judicial integrity and the administration of justice in the country’s legal system.

The case, heard at the Bondo Law Court in Siaya County, involved a plaintiff, Sabina Akinyi Masogo, suing as the administrator of her late husband Domnick Masogo Umaya’s estate, against defendants Joseph Agola Adundo and the District Land Registrar of Bondo. At issue was the ownership of a parcel of land known as South Sakwa/Barkowino/2805.

In the first judgment, delivered at 9:50 am on June 26, 2024, Senior Principal Magistrate J.P. Nandi ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The court declared that the land had been illegally transferred to the first defendant, Joseph Agola Adundo, and ordered the revocation of his registration as the proprietor. The judgment directed the District Land Registrar to rectify the register, returning the land to the name of the deceased, Domnick Masogo Umaya.

Magistrate Nandi stated in this ruling: “This Court is satisfied that the Certificate of title held by the 1st defendant JOSEPH AGOLA ADUNDO in respect of parcel SOUTH SAKWA/BARKOWINO/2805 was procured by fraud and as such it is impeachable and ought to be cancelled.”

RELATEDPOSTS

Court suspends privileges for Bill and Melinda gates foundation

November 26, 2024

High court halts impeachment of Meru Governor Kawira

July 25, 2024

However, in a second judgment issued at 3:06 pm on the same day, the same magistrate dismissed the plaintiff’s case, citing failure to prove fraud and the expiration of the statute of limitations.

In this later ruling, Magistrate Nandi wrote: “I find that the plaintiff has not been able to prove her case on balance of probabilities and hereby dismiss her case with costs to the defendant as costs follow the event.”

The conflicting judgments have left both parties and legal observers perplexed. In the first ruling, the court found that the defendant had not discharged his duty of proving how he acquired the suit land, leading to the conclusion that he had illegally and fraudulently obtained the title deed. The second judgment, however, stated that the plaintiff had failed to distinctly plead and prove fraud on the part of the defendants.

The case hinged on a land transfer that occurred on August 15, 1988, when the property was transferred from Domnick Masogo Umaya to Joseph Agola Adundo. The plaintiff alleged that this transfer was fraudulent, a claim that the court initially accepted but later rejected.

In the first judgment, Magistrate Nandi emphasized the importance of deterring fraud and protecting innocent victims. He cited the case of Alberta Mae Gacii vs Attorney General & 4 Others 2006 eKLR, stating: “Cursed should be the day when any crook in the streets of Nairobi or any town in this jurisdiction, using forgery, deceit or any kind of fraud, would acquire a legal and valid title deceitfully snatched from a legally registered innocent proprietor.”

The second judgment, however, focused on the plaintiff’s failure to meet the burden of proof for fraud allegations. It cited the case of Kinyanjui Kamau v George Kamau [2015] eKLR, which held that “allegations of fraud must be pleaded and strictly proved.”

This judgment also raised the issue of the statute of limitations. The court noted that the plaintiff discovered the alleged fraud in 2019 but did not file the suit until 2023, exceeding the three-year limitation period for tort actions under Kenyan law.

Legal experts are concerned about these conflicting judgments, calling it a ‘Jurispesa’ decision where the highest bidder prevailed, with both judgments prepared.

“Even in magistrates courts, because of the doctrine of stare decisis, the philosophy of JurisPESA as propounded and developed by the Supreme Court of Kenya is binding,” said lawyer Ahmednasir Abdullahi.

The Judiciary of Kenya has not yet commented on the conflicting judgments. It remains unclear how this unusual situation will be resolved or what mechanisms exist to address such contradictions within the judicial system.

Previous Post

Audit validates Hanifa’s management of KES 31 million protest victims fundraiser

Next Post

Changing job terms without consent is a breach of contract, Supreme Court rules

Brian Murimi

Brian Murimi

Brian Murimi is a journalist with major interests in covering tech, corporates, startups and business news. When he's not writing, you can find him gaming, watching football or sipping a nice cup of tea. Send tips via bireri@thesharpdaily.com

Related Posts

News

Co-op Bank posts KES 6.9 billion profit in Q1’2025

May 16, 2025
Agriculture And Economy
News

Lets get Kenya out of FATF list

May 9, 2025
News

The downside of Impact Investing

May 2, 2025
News

Leadership challenges at the University of Nairobi

April 24, 2025
News

Easter eggs and earnings: Growing your nest egg with CMMF

April 16, 2025
News

Geoffrey Ruku declares KES 377M net worth during CS vetting

April 15, 2025

LATEST STORIES

Best investments for Kenyan seniors: Secure, predictable & low-risk

May 30, 2025

Why June is the Secret Sweet Spot for Travel

May 30, 2025

Strategies to elevate more women to corporate leadership

May 30, 2025

Tap on Kenya’s 2025 tech revolution

May 30, 2025

How CURBS supports employers and employees

May 30, 2025

NSE deserves more attention from young investors

May 29, 2025

The silent strain of remote work on Kenya’s urban workforce

May 29, 2025

How Kenya’s crypto bill could reshape the digital economy

May 29, 2025
  • About Us
  • Meet The Team
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Email us: editor@thesharpdaily.com

Sharp Daily © 2024

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
  • Business
    • Banking
  • Investments
  • Technology
  • Startups
  • Real Estate
  • Features
  • Appointments
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team

Sharp Daily © 2024