After several years of subdued engagement, Kenya is once again receiving loan commitments from China, marking an important shift in the country’s external financing landscape. Data from the Global Development Policy Centre indicates that Chinese loan commitments to Kenya resumed in 2024 following a four-year pause between 2020 and 2023. This hiatus had reflected growing caution from Beijing as it reassessed lending to developing economies facing increasing debt pressures. For Kenya, which had previously relied heavily on Chinese financing to support large infrastructure projects, the pause highlighted the vulnerabilities associated with dependence on a single bilateral lender.
China has historically been Kenya’s largest bilateral creditor and a central partner in financing the country’s infrastructure ambitions. Over the past two decades, Chinese loans have funded some of the country’s most prominent development projects, including highways and the Mombasa–Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway (SGR). The railway, which links the port city of Mombasa to Nairobi, was largely financed through loans from the Export–Import Bank of China and covered roughly 90% of the project’s cost. Such large-scale infrastructure investments positioned China as a key partner in Kenya’s development strategy during the infrastructure expansion era of the 2010s, when the government aggressively pursued major transport and logistics upgrades.
However, the lending relationship cooled significantly after 2020. Global economic uncertainty, rising debt distress across several developing economies, and concerns about repayment risks led Chinese policy banks to scale back lending. During this period, Kenya increasingly turned to multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to help bridge financing gaps. These institutions played a crucial role in stabilizing Kenya’s public finances as the country navigated fiscal pressures and sought to maintain funding for essential government programs.
The resumption of Chinese lending therefore signals a cautious recalibration rather than a return to the massive infrastructure loans that characterized the previous decade. Across Africa, China has been gradually adjusting its financing strategy, moving away from billion-dollar infrastructure projects toward smaller, more commercially viable ventures. There has also been a growing preference for loans denominated in the Chinese yuan rather than the US dollar, a shift aimed at reducing currency risks and improving repayment sustainability while maintaining China’s economic engagement with the continent.
For Kenya, this renewed engagement comes at a time when the government is actively restructuring its debt profile and seeking more affordable financing options. In 2025, Kenya converted several dollar-denominated Chinese railway loans into yuan, a move designed to significantly reduce annual interest costs and mitigate exchange rate risks. These adjustments illustrate how the country is attempting to manage its external debt more prudently while maintaining access to development financing.
Ultimately, the return of Chinese loan commitments does not necessarily signal a new borrowing spree. Instead, it reflects an evolving financing relationship in which both Kenya and China appear to be prioritizing more sustainable and commercially grounded partnerships. If managed carefully, this new phase of engagement could support Kenya’s infrastructure needs while avoiding the debt vulnerabilities that previously accompanied large-scale borrowing.














